Skip to content

Conversation

bsalomon-snyk
Copy link
Contributor

  • adds unit test that compares a snapshot of a medium-severity License and high-severity vulnerability to screen output

@bsalomon-snyk bsalomon-snyk requested review from cmars and a team as code owners August 5, 2025 17:30
Copy link

snyk-io bot commented Aug 5, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

code/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@bsalomon-snyk bsalomon-snyk requested a review from a team as a code owner August 14, 2025 13:56
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

…," and only if there are non-zero issues in that group

  - Example test summary

│   Total security issues: 1                              │
│   Ignored: 0 [ 0 CRITICAL  0 HIGH  0 MEDIUM  0 LOW ]    │
│   Open   : 1 [ 0 CRITICAL  1 HIGH  0 MEDIUM  0 LOW ]    │
│                                                         │
│   Total license issues: 1                               │
│   Ignored: 0 [ 0 CRITICAL  0 HIGH  0 MEDIUM  0 LOW ]    │
│   Open   : 1 [ 0 CRITICAL  0 HIGH  1 MEDIUM  0 LOW ]    │

  - adds tests for licenses without security issues, and vice versa
…cy CLI

  - pending ignores are counted as Open issues and labeled with [ PENDING IGNORE... ]
  - ignored issues are labeled [ IGNORED ] and counted in Total Issues but not Open issues
  - both are prepended with "!" instead of "X"
@bsalomon-snyk bsalomon-snyk merged commit 27373e5 into main Aug 19, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants